The CTO
A senior partner in your decisions.
Architecture, hiring, what to build next, what not to build. Wojciech is in the room when those calls get made.
Technical Partnership. Closer to a co-founder than a vendor.
Embedded fractional CTO with a senior build team. Architecture, hiring, and the hands to ship under one engagement. Monthly retainer plus scope, long-running by default.
A founding partnership.
Not a build contract.
The default agency model assumes a known scope and a clean handoff.
Domain-expert founders rarely have either.
The team
A real in-house build team.
Three more senior developers behind the CTO, working to the same standards. Real capacity to ship two workstreams in parallel.
The pricing
Monthly retainer plus scope.
You're paying for ongoing technical judgment. Scope shifts as you learn. The model is built for that.
The horizon
Long-running, by default.
We stay long enough to ship, then long enough to maintain what we shipped. Most engagements run multiple years. We're not optimizing for the next handoff.
Different domains, same engagement shape.
Campaign Finance
Political finance, regulated industry
A non-technical political-finance operator brought us a decade of regulated-industry expertise and a problem nobody had solved well. We took it on as our own. Wojciech is a co-founder. Our deepest engagement to date.
Architecture from scratch. Co-founder-grade equity stake. Long-running engagement, still active.
- Founder
- Political-finance operator
- Stack
- TanStack Start + Supabase
- Started
- 2025
- Status
- Bootstrapped · Profitable · Shipping
Systellar Space
Satellite data platform
Two semi-technical space-domain founders, mid-build, trying to figure out the architecture for a satellite data platform. We advised, then we built it. In production since 2026.
Started as advisory. Converted to a partnership engagement once the technical answer was clear. Founders kept ownership; we kept technical judgment.
- Founders
- Space-domain engineers
- Started
- 2025
- Status
- In production · Funding secured
How we work
AI as leverage for senior engineering.
Never as a replacement for it.
The structural argument is on the stack page.
Specification-driven.
We write the design before we write the code, AI or otherwise. The spec is what we review, argue about, and change. Implementation is downstream of judgment.
Aggressive review.
Every change is read by a senior engineer before it ships. AI implementation doesn't get a free pass. It raises the bar on review.
End-to-end type safety.
TanStack Start + Supabase generates types from your database to the frontend. AI hallucinations break the build before they reach production.
Built to be inherited.
When the engagement ends — if it ends — you're left with code another senior team can read. Maintenance is a design constraint we hold up front.
Built for domain-expert founders.
- You’ve spent years in some specific field: a working musician, a political operative, a satellite engineer, a clinician, a sector veteran. Domain depth is the thing you’re bringing.
- You’ve seen a problem only you can describe properly, and you can’t find a textbook software answer to it.
- You can’t (yet) hire a full-time CTO with a build team behind them, but the work still needs senior engineering.
- You’ve been burned, or know someone who has, by the spec-and-deliver agency model. You’re looking for a technical peer to make the calls with you.
Tell us about
your domain.
Tell us what you’re building and what you know about your field that nobody else does. We read every message and usually reply within a day.
- hello@feathered.eu
- Phone
- +48 664 741 894
- Calendar
- Book a 30-minute call ↗